References
1.
Biemont C, Cizeron G: Distribution
of transposable elements in Drosophila species. Genetica
1999, 105(1):43-62. PubMed-10483093
2.
Kimura K, Kidwell MG: Differences
in P element population dynamics between the sibling species Drosophila
melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genet
Res 1994, 63(1):27-38.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0073559
3.
Montchamp-Moreau C: Dynamics
of P-M hybrid dysgenesis in P-transformed lines of Drosophila simulans. Evolution
1990, 44(1):194-203.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0051729
4.
True JR, Mercer JM, Laurie
CC: Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three
sibling
species of Drosophila. Genetics
1996, 142(2):507-523.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086665
5.
Clark AG, Wang L: Comparative
evolutionary analysis of metabolism in nine Drosophila species. Evolution
1994, 48(4):1230-1243.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0079949
6.
Amlou M, Moreteau B, David
JR: Genetic analysis of Drosophila sechellia specialization:
oviposition
behavior toward the major aliphatic acids of its host plant. Behav
Genet 1998, 28(6):455-464.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0106143
7.
Stensmyr MC, Dekker T,
Hansson BS: Evolution of the olfactory code in the Drosophila
melanogaster
subgroup.
Proc r Soc Biol Sci 2003, 270(1531):2333-2340.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0168014
8.
Orgogozo V, Muro NM, Stern
DL: Variation in fiber number of a male-specific muscle between
Drosophila
species: a genetic and developmental analysis. Evol
& Dev 2007, 9(4):368-377.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0202318.html
9.
Sturtevant AH: A new
species closely resembling Drosophila melanogaster. Psyche
1919, 26:153-155. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0000977.html
10.
Tsacas L, David J: Une
septieme espece appartenant au sous-groupe Drosophila melanogaster Meigen:
Drosophila
orena
spec. nov. du Cameroun (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Beitr
Entomol 1978, 28:179-182.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0031054.html
11.
Sameoto DD, Miller RS: Factors
controlling the productivity of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila
simulans.
Ecology 1966,
47:695-704. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0017712
12.
Ringo JM, Chess K, Dowse
H: Distinguishing the eggs of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. D I S 1987, 66:166. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045923
13.
Moreteau B, Petavy G,
Gibert P, Morin JP, Munoz A, David J: New discriminating traits
between
females of two sibling species: Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
(Diptera : Drosophilidae). Ann
Soc Entomol Fr 1995, 31(3):249-257.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0084199.html
14.
Lott SE, Kreitman M,
Palsson A, Alekseeva E, Ludwig MZ: Canalization of segmentation and
its
evolution in Drosophila. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104(26):10926-10931.
PubMed-17569783
15.
Kalantzi-Makri MC,
Trougakos IP, Tafas TP, Sourdis J, Margaritis LH: Phylogenetic and
taxonomical relationships of the eight species in the melanogaster
subgroup of
the genus Drosophila (Sophophora) based on the electrophoretic mobility
of the
major chorion proteins and the eggshell ultrastructure. J
Zool 1999, 249:295-306. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123070.html
16.
Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS: Rapid
Evolution of Outer Egg Membrane Proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster
Subgroup: A Case of Ecologically Driven Evolution of Female
Reproductive Traits. Mol
Biol Evol 2007, 24(4):929-938.PubMed-17244601
17.
Thomopoulos GN: An
ultrastructural and histochemical study of the secretory granules in
the
salivary gland cells of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup:
phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary aspects. Canad
J Zool 1987, 65(4):950-957.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045746
18.
Rizki TM, Rizki RM: The
direction of evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup
based on
functional analysis of the crystal cells. J exp
Zool 1980, 212(3):323-328.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035234
19.
Okada T: Systematic
Study of the Early Stages of Drosophilidae;
1968. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0019089.html
20.
Sucena E, Stern DL: Divergence
of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling
species
caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. P
Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97(9):4530-4534.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0127340.html
21.
Stern DL: A role of
Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species. Nature
1998, 396(6710):463-466.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0105938.html
22.
Capy P, David JR,
Robertson A: Thoracic trident pigmentation in natural populations
of
Drosophila simulans: a comparison with Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity
1988, 61:263-268. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0048320
23.
Gibert P, Capy P, Imasheva
A, Moreteau B, Morin JP, Petavy G, David JR: Comparative analysis
of
morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans:
genetic
variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity. Genetica
2004, 120(1-3):165-179.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174661
24.
David JR, Gibert P, Petavy
G, Moreteau B: Variable modes of inheritance of morphometrical
traits in
hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Proc r
Soc Biol Sci 2002, 269(1487):127-135.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0145209
25.
Gallo AJ: Morphological
distinction between female Drosophila melanogaster and female
Drosophila
simulans.
Cienc e Cult 1973, 25:341-345. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024696
26.
Thompson JN, Hisey BN,
Woodruff RC: Morphological differences between the females of
Drosophila
melanogaster and D. simulans. SWest
Nat 1979, 24(1):204-205.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0028147
27.
McNamee S, Dytham C: Morphometric
discrimination of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster Meigen
and
Drosophila simulans Sturtevant (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Syst
Ent 1993, 18(3):231-236.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0059351
28.
Burla H: Systematik,
Verbreitung und Oekologie der Drosophila-Arten der Schweiz. Rev
Suisse Zool 1951, 61:1-218. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0008330.html
29.
Dekker T, Ibba I, Siju KP,
Stensmyr MC, Hansson BS: Olfactory shifts parallel superspecialism
for toxic
fruit in Drosophila melanogaster sibling, D. sechellia. Curr
Biol 2006, 16(1):101-109.PubMed-16401429
30.
Ashburner M, Golic KG,
Hawley RS: Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold
Spring Harbor, New York: Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2005. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0202435.html
31.
Hyytia P, Capy P, David JR,
Singh RS: Enzymatic and quantitative variation in European and
African
populations of Drosophila simulans. Heredity
1985, 54(2):209-217.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0042830
32.
Capy P, Pla E, David JR: Phenotypic
and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations
of
Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genet
Sel Evol 1993, 25(6):517-536.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0067304
33.
Nolte DJ: Eye pigment
relationships in three species groups of Drosophila. Evolution
1958, 12:519-531. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0011996.html
34.
Hammerle B, Ferrus A: Expression
of enhancers is altered in Drosophila melanogaster hybrids. Evol
Dev 2003, 5(3):221-230.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0160589.html
35.
Watada M, Ohba S, Tobari,
Y.N.: Genetic differentiation in Japanese populations of Drosophila
simulans
and D. melanogaster. II. Morphological variation. Jpn J
Genet 1986, 61:469-480. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0044974.html
36.
Manning A: The sexual
behaviour of two sibling Drosophila species. Behaviour
1959, 15:123-145. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0012437
37.
Macdonald SJ: Wing
shape in the Drosophila simulans species comple1X. D I S 2002, 85:31-34. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0160761
38.
Civetta A, Singh RS: Sex
and speciation: Genetic architecture and evolutionary potential of
sexual
versus nonsexual traits in the sibling species of the Drosophila
melanogaster
comple1X. Evolution
1998, 52(4):1080-1092.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0104629
39.
Coyne JA: Genetic basis
of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of
Drosophila. Evolution
1983, 37:1101-1118.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039335
40.
Morin JP, Moreteau B,
Petavy G, Imasheva AG, David JR: Body size and developmental
temperature in
Drosophila simulans: Comparison of reaction norms with sympatric
Drosophila
melanogaster. Genet
Sel Evol 1996, 28(5):415-436.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0092635
41.
Petavy G, Morin JP,
Moreteau B, David JR: Growth temperature and phenotypic plasticity
in two
Drosophila sibling species: probable adaptive changes in flight
capacities. J evol biol 1997, 10:875-887. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0100383.html
42.
Tantawy AO, Mallah GS,
Tewfik HR: Studies on natural populations of Drosophila. II.
Heritability
and response to selection for wing length in Drosophila melanogaster
and D.
simulans at different temperatures. Genetics
1964, 49:935-948. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0016299.html
43.
Tantawy AO, Mallah GS: Studies
on natural populations of Drosophila. I. Heat resistance and
geographical
variation in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Evolution
1961, 15:1-14. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0013849
44.
Morin JP, Moreteau B,
Petavy G, David JR: Divergence of reaction norms of size characters
between
tropical and temperate populations of Drosophila melanogaster and
D-simulans. J Evolution Biol 1999, 12(2):329-339.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0107895.html
45.
Pitnick S, Markow TA,
Spicer GS: Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm
in
Drosophila.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92(23):10614-10618.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0084272
46.
Coyne JA, Kreitman M: Evolutionary
genetics of two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila
sechellia. Evolution 1986, 40(4):673-691.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0044312
47.
Macdonald SJ, Goldstein
DB: A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits
distinguishing the
sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics
1999, 153(4):1683-1699.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123115
48.
Coyne JA, Rux J, David JR:
Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between
Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet
Res 1991, 57(2):113-122.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0054077
49.
True JR, Liu JJ, Stam LF,
Zeng ZB, Laurie CC: Quantitative genetic analysis of divergence in
male
secondary sexual traits between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila
mauritiana. Evolution 1997, 51(3):816-832.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0096476.html
50.
Stanley SM, Parsons PA,
Spence GE, Weber L: Resistance of species of the Drosophila
melanogaster
subgroup to environmental extremes. Aust J
Zool 1980, 28(3):413-421.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0034087
51.
Hoffmann AA: A
laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling species
Drosophila
melanogaster and D. simulans. Animal
Behaviour 1987, 35(3):807-818.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045590.html
52.
David JR, Bocquet C: Similarities
and differences in latitudinal adaptation of two Drosophila sibling
species. Nature 1975, 257:588-590. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0027993
53.
Hodin J, Riddiford LM: Different
mechanisms underlie phenotypic plasticity and interspecific variation
for a
reproductive character in drosophilids (Insecta: Diptera). Evolution
2000, 54(5):1638-1653.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0131315
54.
Louis J, David JR: Ecological
specialization in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: A case
study of
Drosophila sechellia. Acta
Oecol, Oecol gen 1986, 7(3):215-229.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0043684
55.
Lachaise D, David JR,
Lemeunier F, Tsacas L, Ashburner M: The reproductive relationships
of
Drosophila sechellia with Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans
and
Drosophila melanogaster from the Afrotropical region. Evolution
1986, 40(2):262-271.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0044306
56.
R'kha S, Capy R, David JR:
Host-plant specialization in the Drosophila melanogaster species
complex: a
physiological, behavioral, and genetical analysis. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88(5):1835-1839.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0054952
57.
R'kha S, Moreteau B, Coyne
JA, David JR: Evolution of a lesser fitness trait: egg production
in the
specialist Drosophila sechellia. Genet
Res 1997, 69(1):17-23.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0093668
58.
Orgogozo V, Broman KW,
Stern DL: High-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping reveals
sign
epistasis controlling ovariole number between two Drosophila species. Genetics
2006, 173(1):197-205.
Epub 2006 Feb
2019. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0194502.html
59.
Joly D, Bressac C: Sperm
length in Drosophilidae (Diptera): estimation by testis and receptacle
lengths. Int J Insect Morph
Embryol 1994,
23(2):85-92.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0073479
60.
Pitnick S, Markow T,
Spicer GS: Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage
organs in
Drosophila.
Evolution 1999, 53(6):1804-1822.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0127277
61.
Gibert P, Moreteau B,
Moreteau JC, David JR: Growth temperature and adult pigmentation in
two
Drosophila sibling species: An adaptive convergence of reaction norms
in
sympatric populations? Evolution
1996, 50(6):2346-2353.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0092535
62.
Lachaise D, Harry M,
Solignac M, Lemeunier F, Benassi V, Cariou ML: Evolutionary
novelties in
islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from
Sao Tome. Proc r Soc Biol Sci 2000, 267(1452):1487-1495.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0129918
63.
Llopart A, Elwyn S,
Lachaise D, Coyne JA: Genetics of a difference in pigmentation
between
Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Evolution
2002, 56(11):2262-2277.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0155757
64.
Carbone MA, Llopart A,
Deangelis M, Coyne JA, Mackay TF: Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting
the
Difference in Pigmentation Between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics
2005, 171(1):211-225.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0187632
65.
Tsacas L, Baechli G: Drosophila
sechellia, n.sp., huitieme espece du sous-goupe melanogaster des Iles
Sechelles
[Diptera, Drosophilidae]. Revue
fr Ent 1981, 3(4):146-150.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037299
66.
Tsacas L, David JR: Drosophila
mauritiana n.sp. du groupe melanogaster de l'Ile Maurice. Bull
Soc ent Fr 1974, 79:42-46. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025926
67.
Tsacas L: Drosophila
teissieri, nouvelle espece africaine du groupe melanogaster et note sur
deux
autres especes nouvelles pour l'Afrique. Bull
Soc ent Fr 1971, 76:35-45. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0022175
68.
Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF,
Gibson GC, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC: Genetic analysis of a morphological
shape
difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D.
mauritiana. Genetics
1996, 142(4):1129-1145.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0087573
69.
Burla H: Zur Kenntnis
der Drosophiliden der Elfenbeinkuste(Franzosisch West-Afrika). Revue
suisse Zool 1954, 61(Suppl.):1-218.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0009861
70.
Tsacas L, Lachaise D: Quatre
nouvelles espèces de la Côte d'Ivoire du genre Drosophila, groupe
melanogaster, et
discussion de
l'origine du sous-groupe melanogaster
(Diptera : Drosophilidae). Ann
Univ Abidjan,
serie E 1974,
VII(1):193-211.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025841.html
71.
Lachaise D, Capy P, Cariou
ML, Joly D, Lemeunier F, David JR: Nine relatives from one African
ancestor. In: The evolution of
Population Biology. Edited by
Singh RS, Uyenoyama MK: Cambridge University Press;
2004. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0185750.html
72.
David JR, Tsacas L: L’evolution
des Drosophilides: l’oeil du paléontologiste et l’oeil du
biologiste
généticien.
In: Colloq Int du CNRS: 1983;
1983. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039055.html
73.
Bock IR, Wheller MP: The
Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Studies
in Genetics VII Univ
Texas Publ 1972:1-101.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024428.html
74.
Coyne JA: Genetic
studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to
theories of
speciation.
Genet Res 1985, 46:169-192. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0042593
75.
Tatsuta H, Takano-Shimizu
T: Genetic architecture of variation in sex-comb tooth number in
Drosophila
simulans.Genet Res 2006, 87(2):93-107.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0195001.html
76.
Coyne JA, Elwyn S, Kim SY,
Llopart A: Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila
melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. Genet
Res 2004, 84(1):11-26.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0183992
77.
David JR, Bocquet C,
Lemeunier F, Tsacas L: Persistence of male sterility in strains
issued from
hybrids between two sibling species: Drosophila simulans and Drosophila
mauritiana.
J Genet 1976,
62(3):93-100.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0028995
78.
Joly D, Korol A, Nevo E: Sperm
size evolution in Drosophila: inter- and intraspecific analysis. Genetica
2004, 120(1-3):233-244.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174667
79.
Joly D, Bressac C, Devaux
J, Lachaise D: Sperm length diversity in Drosophilidae. D I S 1991, 70:104-108. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0053516
80.
Joly D, Bazin C, Zeng LW,
Singh RS: Genetic basis of sperm and testis length differences and
epistatic
effect on hybrid inviability and sperm motility between Drosophila
simulans and
D. sechellia. Heredity
1997, 78(4):354-362.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0093531
81.
Joly D: Between species
divergence of cyst length distributions in the Drosophila melanogaster
species
comple1X. Jpn
J Genet 1987,
62(3):257-263.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0046890
82.
Gailey DA, Ohshima S,
Santiago SJ, Montez JM, Arellano AR, Robillo J, Villarimo CA, Roberts
L, Fine
E, Villella A et al: The
muscle of Lawrence in Drosophila: a case of repeated
evolutionary loss. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94(9):4543-4547.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0093457
83.
Sturtevant AH: Contributions
to the genetics of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Publs
Carnegie Instn 1929, 399:1-62. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0001865
84.
Herskowitz IH: The
survival and developmental rates of Drosophila melanogaster and
Drosophila
simulans.
Am Nat 1953,
87:113-115.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0008836
85.
Moore JA: Competition
between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I
Population cage
experiments 1952, 6:407-420. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0008544
86.
Miller RS: Larval
competition in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Ecology
1964, 45:132-148. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0016133
87.
Barker JSF, Podger RN: Interspecific
competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans:
Effects of
larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology
1970, 51:170-189. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0021458
88.
Cohet Y, Vouidibio J,
David JR: Thermal tolerance and geographic distribution: a
comparison of
cosmopolitan and tropical endemic Drosophila species. J
Thermal Biol 1980, 5(2):69-74.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035213
89.
McKenzie JA: The effect
of developmental temperature on population flexibility in Drosophila
melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J
Zool 1978, 26(1):105-112.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0031032
90.
Allemand R: Physiological
tolerance of Drosophila simulans to dark environment: A comparison with
Drosophila melanogaster. J
Insect Physiol 1982, 28(9):767-772.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0072483
91.
Jenkins NL, Hoffmann AA: Limits
to the southern border of Drosophila serrata: cold resistance,
heritable
variation, and trade-offs. Evolution
1999, 53(6):1823-1834.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0127141
92.
Petavy G, David JR, Gibert
P, Moreteau B: Viability and rate of development at different
temperatures
in Drosophila: a comparison of constant and alternating thermal regimes. J
Thermal Biol 2001, 26(1):29-39.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0132380
93.
Erk FC, Sang JH: The
comparative nutritional requirements of two sibling species Drosophila
simulans
and Drosophila melanogaster. J
Insect Physiol 1966, 12:43-51. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0017951
94.
Eslin P, Prevost G: Hemocyte
load and immune resistance to Asobara tabida are correlated in species
of the
Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. J
Insect Physiol 1998, 44(9):807-816.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0103489
95.
Eslin P, Prevost G: Variation
in Drosophila concentration of haemocytes associated with different
ability to
encapsulate Asobara tabida larval parasitoid. J
Insect Physiol 1996, 42(6):549-555.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0089645
96.
Carton Y, Kitano H: Evolutionary
relationships to parasitism by seven species of the Drosophila
melanogaster
subgroup.
Biol J Linn Soc 1981, 16(3):227-241.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035874
97.
Rouault J: Role des
parasites entomophages dans la competition entre especes jumelles de
drosophiles: approche experimentale. C r
Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1979, 289(8):643-646.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032805
98.
Charlat S, Nirgianaki A,
Bourtzis K, Mercot H: Evolution of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic
incompatibility in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Evolution
2002, 56(9):1735-1742.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0151972
99.
Poinsot D, Bourtzis K,
Markakis G, Savakis C, Mercot H: Wolbachia transfer from Drosophila
melanogaster into D. simulans: host effect and cytoplasmic
incompatibility
relationships. Genetics
1998, 150(1):227-237.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0104498
100.
Boyle L, O'Neill SL,
Robertson HM, Karr TL: Interspecific and intraspecific horizontal
transfer
of Wolbachia in Drosophila. Science
1993, 260(5115):1796-1799.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0059338
101.
Veneti Z, Clark ME,
Zabalou S, Karr TL, Savakis C, Bourtzis K: Cytoplasmic
incompatibility and
sperm cyst infection in different Drosophila-Wolbachia associations. Genetics
2003, 164(2):545-552.PubMed-12807775
102.
Veneti Z, Clark ME, Karr
TL, Savakis C, Bourtzis K: Heads or tails: host-parasite
interactions in the
Drosophila-Wolbachia system. Appl
Environ Microbiol 2004, 70(9):5366-5372.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0179946.html
103.
el Helw MR, Ali AMM: Competition
between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans on media
supplemented
with Saccharomyces and Schizosaccharomyces. Evolution
1970, 24:531-537. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0021475
104.
el Helw MR, Ali AMM,
Moawad H: Fitness of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila
simulans in
relation to natural genera of yeasts. Egypt
J Genet Cytol 1972, 1:196-202. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023819
105.
Hosgood SMW, Parsons PA: Differences
between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster in tolerances
to
laboratory temperatures. D I S 1966, 41:176. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0017609
106.
Hoffmann AA, Watson M: Geographical
variation in the acclimation responses of Drosophila to temperature
extremes. Am Nat 1993, 142(Suppl.):S93-S113.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0057778
107.
Davidson JK: Non-parallel
geographic patterns for tolerance to cold and desiccation in Drosophila
melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J
Zool 1990, 38(2):155-161.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0051159
108.
Parsons PA: Resistance
to cold temperature stress in populations of Drosophila melanogaster
and
Drosophila simulans. Aust J
Zool 1977, 25(4):693-698.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0029593
109.
Chakir M, Chafik A,
Moreteau B, Gibert P, David JR: Male sterility thermal thresholds
in
Drosophila: D. simulans appears more cold-adapted than its sibling D.
melanogaster. Genetica
2002, 114(2):195-205.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0149008
110.
Parsons PA: Resistance
of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
to high
temperatures in relation to humidity: evolutionary implications. Evolution
1979, 33:131-136. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0033038
111.
Parsons PA: Parallel
climatic races for tolerances to high temperature-desiccation stress in
two
Drosophila species. J
Biogeogr 1980, 7(1):97-101.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035130
112.
Jenkins NL, Hoffmann AA: Genetic
and maternal variation for heat resistance in Drosophila from the field. Genetics
1994, 137(3):783-789.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0073462
113.
Levins R: Thermal
acclimation and heat resistance in Drosophila species. Am Nat
1969, 103:483-499. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0020178
114.
Krebs RA: A comparison
of Hsp70 expression and thermotolerance in adults and larvae of three
Drosophila species. Cell
Stress Chaperones 1999, 4(4):243-249.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123091
115.
McKenzie JA, Parsons PA: The
genetic architecture of resistance to desiccation in populations of
Drosophila
melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J
biol Sci 1974, 27:441-456. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0026787
116.
Hoffmann AA: Acclimation
for desiccation resistance in Drosophila: species and population
comparisons. J
Insect Physiol 1991, 37(10):757-762.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0054478
117.
David JR, van Herrewege J:
Adaptation to alcoholic fermentation in Drosophila species:
relationship
between alcohol tolerance and larval habitat. Comp
Biochem Physiol 1983, 74(2):283-288.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039057
118.
Mercot H, Defaye D, Capy
P, Pla E, David JR: Alcohol tolerance, ADH activity, and ecological
niche of
Drosophila species. Evolution
1994, 48(3):746-757.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0079020
119.
David J, Fouillet P, Arens
MF: Comparison of the tolerance to ethanol of six species of the
melanogaster subgroup of Drosophila. Arch
Zool exp gen 1974, 115:401-410. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025859
120.
Parsons PA: Ethanol
utilization: threshold differences among six closely related species of
Drosophila.
Aust J Zool 1980, 28(4):535-541.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0034088
121.
Parsons PA, Spence GE: Ethanol
utilization: threshold differences among three Drosophila species. Am Nat
1981, 117(4):568-571.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035744
122.
Parsons PA, Spence GE: Longevity,
resource utilization and larval preferences in Drosophila: inter- and
intraspecific variation. Aust J
Zool 1981, 29(5):671-678.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037457
123.
McKenzie JA, Parsons PA: Alcohol
tolerance: an ecological parameter in the relative success of
Drosophila
melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Oecologia
1972, 10(4):373-388.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024307
124.
Parsons PA, Spence GE: Acetaldehyde:
a low-concentration resource and larval attractant in 3 Drosophila
species. Experientia 1981, 37(6):576-577.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0036420
125.
Moreteau B, R'kha S, David
JR: Genetics of a nonoptimal behavior: oviposition preference of
Drosophila
mauritiana for a toxic resource. Behav
Genet 1994, 24(5):433-441.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0075952
126.
Legal L, David JR, Jallon
JM: Toxicity and attraction effects produced by Morinda citrifolia
fruits on
the Drosophila melanogaster complex of species. Chemoecology
1992, 3(3-4):125-129.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0080202
127.
Farine JP, Legal L,
Moreteau B, le Quere JL: Volatile components of ripe fruits of
Morinda
citrifolia and their effects on Drosophila. Phytochemistry
1996, 41(2):433-438.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086399
128.
Amlou M, Moreteau B, David
JR: Larval tolerance in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex
toward
the two toxic acids of the D. sechellia host plant. Hereditas
1998, 129(1):7-14. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0105768
129.
Amlou M, Pla E, Moreteau
B, David JR: Genetic analysis by interspecific crosses of the
tolerance of
Drosophila sechellia to major aliphatic acids of its host plant. Genet
Sel Evol 1997, 29(5):511-522.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0101866
130.
Liang BL, Fuyama Y: Can
Drosophila simulans breed on Morinda citrifolia, the host plant of D.
sechellia?
D I S 2000,
83:10-13.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0135566
131.
Legal L, Chappe B, Jallon
JM: Molecular basis of Morinda citrifolia, L.: Toxicity on
Drosophila. J chem
Ecol 1994, 20(8):1931-1943.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0076860
132.
Legal L, Moulin B, Jallon
JM: The relation between structures and toxicity of oxygenated
aliphatic
compounds homologous to the insecticide octanoic acid and the
chemotaxis of two
species of Drosophila. Pestic
Biochem Physiol 1999, 65(2):90-101.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123104
133.
Jones CD: The genetic
basis of larval resistance to a host plant toxin in Drosophila
sechellia. Genet Res 2001, 78(3):225-233.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0144885
134.
Jones CD: The genetic
basis of Drosophila sechellia's resistance to a host plant toxin. Genetics
1998, 149(4):1899-1908.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0103289
135.
Shibata H, Yamazaki T: A
comparative study of the enzymological features of alpha-amylase in the
Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Jpn J
Genet 1994, 69(3):251-258.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0076805
136.
Robertson HM: Mating
behavior and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution
1983, 37(6):1283-1293.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039338
137.
von Schilcher F, Manning
A: Courtship song and mating speed in hybrids between Drosophila
melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav
Genet 1975, 5:395-404. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0027135
138.
Lachaise D: Reproductive
allocation in tropical Drosophilidae: further evidence on the role of
breeding-site
choice. Am
Nat 1983,
122(1):132-146.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0038841
139.
David J, Biemont C,
Fouillet P: Sur la forme des courbes de ponte de Drosophila
melanogaster et
leur ajustement a des modeles mathematiques. Arch
Zool exp gen 1974, 115:263-277. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025858
140.
Jones CD: Genetics of
egg production in Drosophila sechellia. Heredity
2004, 92(3):235-241.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174735
141.
Soliman MH: Selection
of site of oviposition by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila
simulans. Am Midl Nat 1971, 86:487-493. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0022087
142.
Jallon JM, David JR: Variations
in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila
melanogaster subgroup. Evolution
1987, 41(2):294-302.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0046207
143.
Jallon JM, Cobb M: Variations
in potentially aphrodisiac cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight
species of
the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. J
Neurogenet 1987, 4:140-141. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0046803
144.
Cobb M, Burnet B, Blizard
R, Jallon JM: Courtship in Drosophila sechellia: its structure,
functional
aspects, and relationship to those of other members of the Drosophila
melanogaster
species subgroup. J
Insect Behav 1989, 2(1):63-90.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0050326
145.
Luyten I: Intraspecific
and interspecific variations of the cuticular hydro carbons in
Drosophila
simulans and related species. C r
Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1982, 295(12):733-736.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037586
146.
Civetta A, Cantor EJ: The
genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D.
sechellia. Genet Res 2003, 82(2):117-126.PubMed-15123580
147.
Coyne JA, Crittenden AP,
Mah K: Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to
reproductive
isolation in Drosophila. Science
1994, 265(5177):1461-1464.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0077505.html
148.
Pechine JM, Perez F,
Antony C, Jallon JM: A further characterization of Drosophila
cuticular
monoenes using a mass spectrometry method to localize double bonds in
complex
mixtures.
Anal Biochem 1985, 145(1):177-182.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0041861
149.
Pechine JM, Antony C,
Jallon JM: Precise characterization of cuticular compounds in young
Drosophila by mass spectrometry. J chem
Ecol 1988, 14(4):1071-1085.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0048547
150.
Mas F, Jallon JM: Sexual
isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila
santomea and
Drosophila yakuba. J
Chem Ecol 2005, 31(11):2747-2752.PubMed-16132336
151.
Moulin B, Rybak F, Aubin
T, Jallon JM: Compared ontogenesis of courtship song components of
males
from the sibling species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Behav
Genet 2001, 31(3):299-308.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0141370.html
152.
Civetta A, Montooth KL,
Mendelson M: Quantitative trait loci and interaction effects
responsible for
variation in female postmating mortality in Drosophila simulans and D.
sechellia
introgression lines. Heredity
2005, 94(1):94-100.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0187717
153.
Cowling DE, Burnet B: Courtship
songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling
species
of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim
Behav 1981, 29:924-935. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035763
154.
Peixoto AA, Hall JC: Analysis
of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals new genes involved in the
courtship
song of Drosophila. Genetics
1998, 148(2):827-838.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0101981.html
155.
Demetriades MC, Thackeray
JR, Kyriacou CP: Courtship song rhythms in Drosophila yakuba. Anim
Behav 1999, 57(2):379-386.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0107672
156.
Ewing AW, Bennet-Clark HC:
The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour
1968, 31:288-301. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0019195
157.
Wheeler DA, Fields WL,
Hall JC: Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship songs:
Drosophila
melanogaster, D. simulans, and their interspecific hybrid. Behav
Genet 1988, 18(6):675-703.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0047539
158.
Pugh AR, Ritchie MG: Polygenic
control of a mating signal in Drosophila. Heredity
1996, 77(4):378-382.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0090750
159.
Gleason JM, Ritchie MG: Do
quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between
Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and
intraspecific QTL? Genetics
2004, 166(3):1303-1311.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174687
160.
Kawanishi M, Watanabe TK: Genetic
variations of courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila
simulans.
Jpn J Genet 1980, 55(3):235-240.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035260
161.
Kawanishi M, Watanabe TK: Genes
affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila
melanogaster,
Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Evolution
1981, 35(6):1128-1133.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0036384
162.
Kyriacou CP, Hall JC: Interspecific
genetic control of courtship song production and reception in
Drosophila. Science
1986, 232(4749):494-497.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045387
163.
Bennet-Clark HC, Ewing AW:
Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of
Drosophila
melanogaster. Anim
Behav 1969, 17:755-759. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0020199
164.
Kyriacou CP, Hall JC: Circadian
rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short term
fluctuations in
the male's courtship song. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 1980, 77(11):6729-6733.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035546
165.
Kyriacou CP, Hall JC: Spectral
analysis of Drosophila courtship song rhythms. Anim
Behav 1989, 37(5):850-859.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0049202
166.
Green CH, Burnet B,
Connolly KJ: Organization and patterns of inter- and intraspecific
variation
in the behaviour of Drosophila larvae. Anim
Behav 1983, 31(1):282-291.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0038859
167.
Barker JSF: Ecological
differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster
and
Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations. Oecologia
1971, 8:139-156. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023087
168.
Parsons PA: Larval
reaction to alcohol as an indicator of resource utilization differences
between
Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Oecologia
1977, 30(2):141-146.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0030626
169.
Parsons PA: Larval
reactions to possible resources in three species of Drosophila as
indicators of
ecological diversity. Aust J
Zool 1979, 27(3):413-419.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032690
170.
Parsons PA, Spence GE: Larval
responses to environmental ethanol in three Drosophila species: an
indicator of
habitat selection. Aust J
Zool 1980, 28(4):543-546.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0034089
171.
Manning M, Markow TA: Light-dependent
pupation site preferences in Drosophila. II. Drosophila melanogaster
and
Drosophila simulans. Behav
Genet 1981, 11(6):557-563.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035811
172.
Sakai T, Isono K, Tomaru
M, Oguma Y: Contribution by males to intraspecific variation of the
light
dependency of mating in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genes
& Genet
Systems 1997,
72(5):269-274.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0103027
173.
Cobb M, Connolly K, Burnet
B: The relationship between locomotor activity and courtship in the
melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Anim
Behav 1987, 35(3):705-713.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045589
174.
McDonald J, Parsons PA: Dispersal
activities of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and
Drosophila
simulans.
Behav Genet 1973, 3(3):293-301.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024586
175.
Prince GJ, Parsons PA: Adaptive
behaviour of Drosophila adults in relation to temperature and humidity. Aust J
Zool 1977, 25:285-290. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0029591
176.
Parsons PA: Phototactic
responses along a gradient of light intensities of the sibling species
Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav
Genet 1975, 5:17-25. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0027128
177.
Kawanishi M, Watanabe TK: Difference
in photo-preferences as a cause of coexistence of Drosophila simulans
and
Drosophila melanogaster in nature. Jpn J
Genet 1978, 53(3):209. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032075
178.
Kekic V, Marinkovic D: Ecological
and behavioral adaptations of Drosophila in field and laboratory
conditions. Aquilo,
Ser Zool 1979, 20:118-128. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032672
179.
Higa I, Fuyama Y: Genetics
of food preference in Drosophila sechellia. I
Responses to food attractants 1993, 88(2-3):129-136.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0064504
180.
Kawanishi M, Lee WH: Food
preferences of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Jpn J
Ecol 1978, 28(3):231-235.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032070
181.
Rouault J, David J: Evolutionary
biology of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: a
behavioural
divergence in microhabitat selection. Acta
Oecol, Oecol gen 1982, 3:331-338. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037392.html
182.
Cobb M, Burnet B, Connolly
K: The structure of courtship in the Drosophila melanogaster
species
sub-group.
Behaviour 1986, 97(1-2):182-212.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0043762
183.
Welbergen P, van Dijken
FR, Scharloo W: Collation of the courtship behaviour of the
sympatric
species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behaviour
1987, 101:253-274. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045616
184.
Cobb M, Burnet B, Connolly
K: Sexual isolation and courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans,
Drosophila mauritiana, and their interspecific hybrids. Behav
Genet 1988, 18(2):211-225.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0047531
185.
Ringo JM, Dowse HB, Barton
KM: Courtship behavior and the kinetics of mating in three lines of
Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Behav
Genet 1987, 17(2):141-154.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045617
186.
Spieth HT, Hsu TC: The
influence of light on the mating behavior of seven species of the
Drosophila
melanogaster species group. Evolution
1950, 4:316-325. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0007753
187.
Sturtevant AH: The
North American species of Drosophila. Publs
Carnegie Instn 1921, 301:1-150. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0001113
188.
Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS: A
time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital
coupling in
Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the
evolution
of male genitalia. J
Evolution Biol 2006, 19(4):1058-1070.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0193123.html
189.
Lemeunier F: Le
comportement sexuel de Drosophila yakuba; comparaison avec les autres
especes
du groupe melanogaster. C r
hebd Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1971, 273:1488-1490.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0022177
190.
Cobb M, Ferveur JF: Evolution
and genetic control of mate recognition and stimulation in Drosophila. Behavl
Processes 1996, 35(1-3):35-54.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086361
191.
Sakai T, Isono K, Tomaru
M, Fukatami A, Oguma Y: Light wavelength dependency of mating
activity in
the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genes
& Genet Systems 2002, 77(3):187-195.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0151995
192.
Grossfield J: Geographic
distribution and light-dependent behavior in Drosophila. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA
1971, 68:2669-2673.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023148
193.
Hardeland R: Species
differences in the diurnal rhythmicity of courtship behaviour within
the
melanogaster group of the genus Drosophila. Anim
Behav 1972, 20:170-174. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023328
194.
Allemand R: Importance evolutive
du comportement de ponte chez les insectes: comparaison du rhythme
circadien
d'oviposition chez les six especes de Drosophila du sous-groupe
melanogaster. C r
hebd Seanc Acad
Sci, Paris 1974,
279:2075-2077.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025937
195.
Takamura T: Behavior
genetics of choice of oviposition sites in Drosophila melanogaster. IV.
Differentiation of oviposition force in the melanogaster species
sub-group. Jpn J Genet 1984, 59:71-81. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0041419.html
196.
Chess KF, Ringo JM: Oviposition
site selection by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Evolution
1985, 39(4):869-877.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0042498
197.
Jones CD: The genetics
of adaptation in Drosophila sechellia. Genetica
2005, 123(1-2):137-145.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0187618.html
198.
Cobb M, Connolly K, Burnet
B: Courtship behaviour in the melanogaster species sub-group of
Drosophila. Behaviour
1985, 95(3-4):203-231.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0041922
199.
Cobb M, Jallon JM: Pheromones,
mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila
melanogaster
species sub-group. Anim
Behav 1990, 39(6):1058-1067.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0051133
200.
Antony C, Davis TL,
Carlson DA, Pechine JM, Jallon JM: Compared behavioral responses of
male
Drosophila melanogaster (Canton-S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J
chem Ecol 1985, 11(2):1617-1629.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0043077.html
201.
Jallon JM: A few
chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav
Genet 1984, 14(5):441-478.
http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0040347.html