References



1.              Biemont C, Cizeron G: Distribution of transposable elements in Drosophila species. Genetica 1999, 105(1):43-62. PubMed-10483093

2.              Kimura K, Kidwell MG: Differences in P element population dynamics between the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genet Res 1994, 63(1):27-38. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0073559

3.              Montchamp-Moreau C: Dynamics of P-M hybrid dysgenesis in P-transformed lines of Drosophila simulans. Evolution 1990, 44(1):194-203. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0051729

4.              True JR, Mercer JM, Laurie CC: Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 1996, 142(2):507-523. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086665

5.              Clark AG, Wang L: Comparative evolutionary analysis of metabolism in nine Drosophila species. Evolution 1994, 48(4):1230-1243. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0079949

6.              Amlou M, Moreteau B, David JR: Genetic analysis of Drosophila sechellia specialization: oviposition behavior toward the major aliphatic acids of its host plant. Behav Genet 1998, 28(6):455-464. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0106143

7.              Stensmyr MC, Dekker T, Hansson BS: Evolution of the olfactory code in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Proc r Soc Biol Sci 2003, 270(1531):2333-2340. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0168014

8.              Orgogozo V, Muro NM, Stern DL: Variation in fiber number of a male-specific muscle between Drosophila species: a genetic and developmental analysis. Evol & Dev 2007, 9(4):368-377. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0202318.html

9.              Sturtevant AH: A new species closely resembling Drosophila melanogaster. Psyche 1919, 26:153-155. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0000977.html

10.           Tsacas L, David J: Une septieme espece appartenant au sous-groupe Drosophila melanogaster Meigen: Drosophila orena spec. nov. du Cameroun (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Beitr Entomol 1978, 28:179-182.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0031054.html

11.           Sameoto DD, Miller RS: Factors controlling the productivity of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.  Ecology 1966, 47:695-704. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0017712

12.           Ringo JM, Chess K, Dowse H: Distinguishing the eggs of D. melanogaster and D. simulans.  D I S 1987, 66:166. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045923

13.           Moreteau B, Petavy G, Gibert P, Morin JP, Munoz A, David J: New discriminating traits between females of two sibling species: Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans (Diptera : Drosophilidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 1995, 31(3):249-257. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0084199.html

14.           Lott SE, Kreitman M, Palsson A, Alekseeva E, Ludwig MZ: Canalization of segmentation and its evolution in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104(26):10926-10931. PubMed-17569783

15.           Kalantzi-Makri MC, Trougakos IP, Tafas TP, Sourdis J, Margaritis LH: Phylogenetic and taxonomical relationships of the eight species in the melanogaster subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora) based on the electrophoretic mobility of the major chorion proteins and the eggshell ultrastructure. J Zool 1999, 249:295-306. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123070.html

16.           Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS: Rapid Evolution of Outer Egg Membrane Proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster Subgroup: A Case of Ecologically Driven Evolution of Female Reproductive Traits. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24(4):929-938.PubMed-17244601

17.           Thomopoulos GN: An ultrastructural and histochemical study of the secretory granules in the salivary gland cells of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary aspects. Canad J Zool 1987, 65(4):950-957.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045746

18.           Rizki TM, Rizki RM: The direction of evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup based on functional analysis of the crystal cells. J exp Zool 1980, 212(3):323-328.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035234

19.           Okada T: Systematic Study of the Early Stages of Drosophilidae; 1968.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0019089.html

20.           Sucena E, Stern DL: Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97(9):4530-4534. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0127340.html

21.           Stern DL: A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species. Nature 1998, 396(6710):463-466. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0105938.html

22.           Capy P, David JR, Robertson A: Thoracic trident pigmentation in natural populations of Drosophila simulans: a comparison with Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 1988, 61:263-268. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0048320

23.           Gibert P, Capy P, Imasheva A, Moreteau B, Morin JP, Petavy G, David JR: Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity. Genetica 2004, 120(1-3):165-179.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174661

24.           David JR, Gibert P, Petavy G, Moreteau B: Variable modes of inheritance of morphometrical traits in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Proc r Soc Biol Sci 2002, 269(1487):127-135.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0145209

25.           Gallo AJ: Morphological distinction between female Drosophila melanogaster and female Drosophila simulans. Cienc e Cult 1973, 25:341-345. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024696

26.           Thompson JN, Hisey BN, Woodruff RC: Morphological differences between the females of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. SWest Nat 1979, 24(1):204-205.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0028147

27.           McNamee S, Dytham C: Morphometric discrimination of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster Meigen and Drosophila simulans Sturtevant (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Syst Ent 1993, 18(3):231-236.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0059351

28.           Burla H: Systematik, Verbreitung und Oekologie der Drosophila-Arten der Schweiz. Rev Suisse Zool 1951, 61:1-218. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0008330.html

29.           Dekker T, Ibba I, Siju KP, Stensmyr MC, Hansson BS: Olfactory shifts parallel superspecialism for toxic fruit in Drosophila melanogaster sibling, D. sechellia. Curr Biol 2006, 16(1):101-109.PubMed-16401429

30.           Ashburner M, Golic KG, Hawley RS: Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2005.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0202435.html

31.           Hyytia P, Capy P, David JR, Singh RS: Enzymatic and quantitative variation in European and African populations of Drosophila simulans. Heredity 1985, 54(2):209-217.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0042830

32.           Capy P, Pla E, David JR: Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genet Sel Evol 1993, 25(6):517-536.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0067304

33.           Nolte DJ: Eye pigment relationships in three species groups of Drosophila. Evolution 1958, 12:519-531. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0011996.html

34.           Hammerle B, Ferrus A: Expression of enhancers is altered in Drosophila melanogaster hybrids. Evol Dev 2003, 5(3):221-230.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0160589.html

35.           Watada M, Ohba S, Tobari, Y.N.: Genetic differentiation in Japanese populations of Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster. II. Morphological variation. Jpn J Genet 1986, 61:469-480. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0044974.html

36.           Manning A: The sexual behaviour of two sibling Drosophila species. Behaviour 1959, 15:123-145. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0012437

37.           Macdonald SJ: Wing shape in the Drosophila simulans species comple1X. D I S 2002, 85:31-34. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0160761

38.           Civetta A, Singh RS: Sex and speciation: Genetic architecture and evolutionary potential of sexual versus nonsexual traits in the sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster comple1X. Evolution 1998, 52(4):1080-1092.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0104629

39.           Coyne JA: Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 1983, 37:1101-1118.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039335

40.           Morin JP, Moreteau B, Petavy G, Imasheva AG, David JR: Body size and developmental temperature in Drosophila simulans: Comparison of reaction norms with sympatric Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Sel Evol 1996, 28(5):415-436.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0092635

41.           Petavy G, Morin JP, Moreteau B, David JR: Growth temperature and phenotypic plasticity in two Drosophila sibling species: probable adaptive changes in flight capacities. J evol biol 1997, 10:875-887. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0100383.html

42.           Tantawy AO, Mallah GS, Tewfik HR: Studies on natural populations of Drosophila. II. Heritability and response to selection for wing length in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans at different temperatures. Genetics 1964, 49:935-948. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0016299.html

43.           Tantawy AO, Mallah GS: Studies on natural populations of Drosophila. I. Heat resistance and geographical variation in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Evolution 1961, 15:1-14. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0013849

44.           Morin JP, Moreteau B, Petavy G, David JR: Divergence of reaction norms of size characters between tropical and temperate populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D-simulans. J Evolution Biol 1999, 12(2):329-339. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0107895.html

45.           Pitnick S, Markow TA, Spicer GS: Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92(23):10614-10618.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0084272

46.           Coyne JA, Kreitman M: Evolutionary genetics of two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia. Evolution 1986, 40(4):673-691.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0044312

47.           Macdonald SJ, Goldstein DB: A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 1999, 153(4):1683-1699.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123115

48.           Coyne JA, Rux J, David JR: Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet Res 1991, 57(2):113-122.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0054077

49.           True JR, Liu JJ, Stam LF, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC: Quantitative genetic analysis of divergence in male secondary sexual traits between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 1997, 51(3):816-832.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0096476.html

50.           Stanley SM, Parsons PA, Spence GE, Weber L: Resistance of species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup to environmental extremes. Aust J Zool 1980, 28(3):413-421.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0034087

51.           Hoffmann AA: A laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Animal Behaviour 1987, 35(3):807-818.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045590.html

52.           David JR, Bocquet C: Similarities and differences in latitudinal adaptation of two Drosophila sibling species. Nature 1975, 257:588-590. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0027993

53.           Hodin J, Riddiford LM: Different mechanisms underlie phenotypic plasticity and interspecific variation for a reproductive character in drosophilids (Insecta: Diptera). Evolution 2000, 54(5):1638-1653.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0131315

54.           Louis J, David JR: Ecological specialization in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: A case study of Drosophila sechellia. Acta Oecol, Oecol gen 1986, 7(3):215-229.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0043684

55.           Lachaise D, David JR, Lemeunier F, Tsacas L, Ashburner M: The reproductive relationships of Drosophila sechellia with Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster from the Afrotropical region. Evolution 1986, 40(2):262-271.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0044306

56.           R'kha S, Capy R, David JR: Host-plant specialization in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex: a physiological, behavioral, and genetical analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88(5):1835-1839.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0054952

57.           R'kha S, Moreteau B, Coyne JA, David JR: Evolution of a lesser fitness trait: egg production in the specialist Drosophila sechellia. Genet Res 1997, 69(1):17-23.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0093668

58.           Orgogozo V, Broman KW, Stern DL: High-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping reveals sign epistasis controlling ovariole number between two Drosophila species. Genetics 2006, 173(1):197-205. Epub 2006 Feb 2019. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0194502.html

59.           Joly D, Bressac C: Sperm length in Drosophilidae (Diptera): estimation by testis and receptacle lengths. Int J Insect Morph Embryol 1994, 23(2):85-92.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0073479

60.           Pitnick S, Markow T, Spicer GS: Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 1999, 53(6):1804-1822.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0127277

61.           Gibert P, Moreteau B, Moreteau JC, David JR: Growth temperature and adult pigmentation in two Drosophila sibling species: An adaptive convergence of reaction norms in sympatric populations? Evolution 1996, 50(6):2346-2353.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0092535

62.           Lachaise D, Harry M, Solignac M, Lemeunier F, Benassi V, Cariou ML: Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Sao Tome. Proc r Soc Biol Sci 2000, 267(1452):1487-1495.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0129918

63.           Llopart A, Elwyn S, Lachaise D, Coyne JA: Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Evolution 2002, 56(11):2262-2277.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0155757

64.           Carbone MA, Llopart A, Deangelis M, Coyne JA, Mackay TF: Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting the Difference in Pigmentation Between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics 2005, 171(1):211-225.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0187632

65.           Tsacas L, Baechli G: Drosophila sechellia, n.sp., huitieme espece du sous-goupe melanogaster des Iles Sechelles [Diptera, Drosophilidae]. Revue fr Ent 1981, 3(4):146-150.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037299

66.           Tsacas L, David JR: Drosophila mauritiana n.sp. du groupe melanogaster de l'Ile Maurice. Bull Soc ent Fr 1974, 79:42-46. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025926

67.           Tsacas L: Drosophila teissieri, nouvelle espece africaine du groupe melanogaster et note sur deux autres especes nouvelles pour l'Afrique. Bull Soc ent Fr 1971, 76:35-45. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0022175

68.           Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC: Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 1996, 142(4):1129-1145.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0087573

69.           Burla H: Zur Kenntnis der Drosophiliden der Elfenbeinkuste(Franzosisch West-Afrika). Revue suisse Zool 1954, 61(Suppl.):1-218.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0009861

70.           Tsacas L, Lachaise D: Quatre nouvelles espèces de la Côte d'Ivoire du genre Drosophila, groupe melanogaster, et discussion de l'origine du sous-groupe melanogaster (Diptera : Drosophilidae). Ann Univ Abidjan, serie E 1974, VII(1):193-211.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025841.html

71.           Lachaise D, Capy P, Cariou ML, Joly D, Lemeunier F, David JR: Nine relatives from one African ancestor. In: The evolution of Population Biology. Edited by Singh RS, Uyenoyama MK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0185750.html

72.           David JR, Tsacas L: L’evolution des Drosophilides: l’oeil du paléontologiste et l’oeil du biologiste généticien. In: Colloq Int du CNRS: 1983; 1983.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039055.html

73.           Bock IR, Wheller MP: The Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Studies in Genetics VII Univ Texas Publ 1972:1-101.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024428.html

74.           Coyne JA: Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to theories of speciation. Genet Res 1985, 46:169-192. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0042593

75.           Tatsuta H, Takano-Shimizu T: Genetic architecture of variation in sex-comb tooth number in Drosophila simulans.Genet Res 2006, 87(2):93-107.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0195001.html

76.           Coyne JA, Elwyn S, Kim SY, Llopart A: Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. Genet Res 2004, 84(1):11-26.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0183992

77.           David JR, Bocquet C, Lemeunier F, Tsacas L: Persistence of male sterility in strains issued from hybrids between two sibling species: Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. J Genet 1976, 62(3):93-100.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0028995

78.           Joly D, Korol A, Nevo E: Sperm size evolution in Drosophila: inter- and intraspecific analysis. Genetica 2004, 120(1-3):233-244.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174667

79.           Joly D, Bressac C, Devaux J, Lachaise D: Sperm length diversity in Drosophilidae. D I S 1991, 70:104-108. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0053516

80.           Joly D, Bazin C, Zeng LW, Singh RS: Genetic basis of sperm and testis length differences and epistatic effect on hybrid inviability and sperm motility between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Heredity 1997, 78(4):354-362.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0093531

81.           Joly D: Between species divergence of cyst length distributions in the Drosophila melanogaster species comple1X. Jpn J Genet 1987, 62(3):257-263.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0046890

82.           Gailey DA, Ohshima S, Santiago SJ, Montez JM, Arellano AR, Robillo J, Villarimo CA, Roberts L, Fine E, Villella A et al: The muscle of Lawrence in Drosophila: a case of repeated evolutionary loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94(9):4543-4547.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0093457

83.           Sturtevant AH: Contributions to the genetics of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Publs Carnegie Instn 1929, 399:1-62. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0001865

84.           Herskowitz IH: The survival and developmental rates of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Am Nat 1953, 87:113-115.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0008836

85.           Moore JA: Competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I Population cage experiments 1952, 6:407-420. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0008544

86.           Miller RS: Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Ecology 1964, 45:132-148. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0016133

87.           Barker JSF, Podger RN: Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: Effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology 1970, 51:170-189. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0021458

88.           Cohet Y, Vouidibio J, David JR: Thermal tolerance and geographic distribution: a comparison of cosmopolitan and tropical endemic Drosophila species. J Thermal Biol 1980, 5(2):69-74.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035213

89.           McKenzie JA: The effect of developmental temperature on population flexibility in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J Zool 1978, 26(1):105-112.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0031032

90.           Allemand R: Physiological tolerance of Drosophila simulans to dark environment: A comparison with Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 1982, 28(9):767-772.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0072483

91.           Jenkins NL, Hoffmann AA: Limits to the southern border of Drosophila serrata: cold resistance, heritable variation, and trade-offs. Evolution 1999, 53(6):1823-1834.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0127141

92.           Petavy G, David JR, Gibert P, Moreteau B: Viability and rate of development at different temperatures in Drosophila: a comparison of constant and alternating thermal regimes. J Thermal Biol 2001, 26(1):29-39.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0132380

93.           Erk FC, Sang JH: The comparative nutritional requirements of two sibling species Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 1966, 12:43-51. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0017951

94.           Eslin P, Prevost G: Hemocyte load and immune resistance to Asobara tabida are correlated in species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. J Insect Physiol 1998, 44(9):807-816.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0103489

95.           Eslin P, Prevost G: Variation in Drosophila concentration of haemocytes associated with different ability to encapsulate Asobara tabida larval parasitoid. J Insect Physiol 1996, 42(6):549-555.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0089645

96.           Carton Y, Kitano H: Evolutionary relationships to parasitism by seven species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Biol J Linn Soc 1981, 16(3):227-241.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035874

97.           Rouault J: Role des parasites entomophages dans la competition entre especes jumelles de drosophiles: approche experimentale. C r Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1979, 289(8):643-646.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032805

98.           Charlat S, Nirgianaki A, Bourtzis K, Mercot H: Evolution of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Evolution 2002, 56(9):1735-1742.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0151972

99.           Poinsot D, Bourtzis K, Markakis G, Savakis C, Mercot H: Wolbachia transfer from Drosophila melanogaster into D. simulans: host effect and cytoplasmic incompatibility relationships. Genetics 1998, 150(1):227-237.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0104498

100.        Boyle L, O'Neill SL, Robertson HM, Karr TL: Interspecific and intraspecific horizontal transfer of Wolbachia in Drosophila. Science 1993, 260(5115):1796-1799.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0059338

101.        Veneti Z, Clark ME, Zabalou S, Karr TL, Savakis C, Bourtzis K: Cytoplasmic incompatibility and sperm cyst infection in different Drosophila-Wolbachia associations. Genetics 2003, 164(2):545-552.PubMed-12807775

102.        Veneti Z, Clark ME, Karr TL, Savakis C, Bourtzis K: Heads or tails: host-parasite interactions in the Drosophila-Wolbachia system. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70(9):5366-5372.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0179946.html

103.        el Helw MR, Ali AMM: Competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans on media supplemented with Saccharomyces and Schizosaccharomyces. Evolution 1970, 24:531-537. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0021475

104.        el Helw MR, Ali AMM, Moawad H: Fitness of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in relation to natural genera of yeasts. Egypt J Genet Cytol 1972, 1:196-202. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023819

105.        Hosgood SMW, Parsons PA: Differences between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster in tolerances to laboratory temperatures. D I S 1966, 41:176. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0017609

106.        Hoffmann AA, Watson M: Geographical variation in the acclimation responses of Drosophila to temperature extremes. Am Nat 1993, 142(Suppl.):S93-S113.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0057778

107.        Davidson JK: Non-parallel geographic patterns for tolerance to cold and desiccation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J Zool 1990, 38(2):155-161.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0051159

108.        Parsons PA: Resistance to cold temperature stress in populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J Zool 1977, 25(4):693-698.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0029593

109.        Chakir M, Chafik A, Moreteau B, Gibert P, David JR: Male sterility thermal thresholds in Drosophila: D. simulans appears more cold-adapted than its sibling D. melanogaster. Genetica 2002, 114(2):195-205.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0149008

110.        Parsons PA: Resistance of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans to high temperatures in relation to humidity: evolutionary implications. Evolution 1979, 33:131-136. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0033038

111.        Parsons PA: Parallel climatic races for tolerances to high temperature-desiccation stress in two Drosophila species. J Biogeogr 1980, 7(1):97-101.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035130

112.        Jenkins NL, Hoffmann AA: Genetic and maternal variation for heat resistance in Drosophila from the field. Genetics 1994, 137(3):783-789.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0073462

113.        Levins R: Thermal acclimation and heat resistance in Drosophila species. Am Nat 1969, 103:483-499. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0020178

114.        Krebs RA: A comparison of Hsp70 expression and thermotolerance in adults and larvae of three Drosophila species. Cell Stress Chaperones 1999, 4(4):243-249.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123091

115.        McKenzie JA, Parsons PA: The genetic architecture of resistance to desiccation in populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Aust J biol Sci 1974, 27:441-456. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0026787

116.        Hoffmann AA: Acclimation for desiccation resistance in Drosophila: species and population comparisons. J Insect Physiol 1991, 37(10):757-762.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0054478

117.        David JR, van Herrewege J: Adaptation to alcoholic fermentation in Drosophila species: relationship between alcohol tolerance and larval habitat. Comp Biochem Physiol 1983, 74(2):283-288.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039057

118.        Mercot H, Defaye D, Capy P, Pla E, David JR: Alcohol tolerance, ADH activity, and ecological niche of Drosophila species. Evolution 1994, 48(3):746-757.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0079020

119.        David J, Fouillet P, Arens MF: Comparison of the tolerance to ethanol of six species of the melanogaster subgroup of Drosophila. Arch Zool exp gen 1974, 115:401-410. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025859

120.        Parsons PA: Ethanol utilization: threshold differences among six closely related species of Drosophila. Aust J Zool 1980, 28(4):535-541.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0034088

121.        Parsons PA, Spence GE: Ethanol utilization: threshold differences among three Drosophila species. Am Nat 1981, 117(4):568-571.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035744

122.        Parsons PA, Spence GE: Longevity, resource utilization and larval preferences in Drosophila: inter- and intraspecific variation. Aust J Zool 1981, 29(5):671-678.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037457

123.        McKenzie JA, Parsons PA: Alcohol tolerance: an ecological parameter in the relative success of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Oecologia 1972, 10(4):373-388.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024307

124.        Parsons PA, Spence GE: Acetaldehyde: a low-concentration resource and larval attractant in 3 Drosophila species. Experientia 1981, 37(6):576-577.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0036420

125.        Moreteau B, R'kha S, David JR: Genetics of a nonoptimal behavior: oviposition preference of Drosophila mauritiana for a toxic resource. Behav Genet 1994, 24(5):433-441.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0075952

126.        Legal L, David JR, Jallon JM: Toxicity and attraction effects produced by Morinda citrifolia fruits on the Drosophila melanogaster complex of species. Chemoecology 1992, 3(3-4):125-129.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0080202

127.        Farine JP, Legal L, Moreteau B, le Quere JL: Volatile components of ripe fruits of Morinda citrifolia and their effects on Drosophila. Phytochemistry 1996, 41(2):433-438.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086399

128.        Amlou M, Moreteau B, David JR: Larval tolerance in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex toward the two toxic acids of the D. sechellia host plant. Hereditas 1998, 129(1):7-14. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0105768

129.        Amlou M, Pla E, Moreteau B, David JR: Genetic analysis by interspecific crosses of the tolerance of Drosophila sechellia to major aliphatic acids of its host plant. Genet Sel Evol 1997, 29(5):511-522.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0101866

130.        Liang BL, Fuyama Y: Can Drosophila simulans breed on Morinda citrifolia, the host plant of D. sechellia? D I S 2000, 83:10-13.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0135566

131.        Legal L, Chappe B, Jallon JM: Molecular basis of Morinda citrifolia, L.: Toxicity on Drosophila. J chem Ecol 1994, 20(8):1931-1943.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0076860

132.        Legal L, Moulin B, Jallon JM: The relation between structures and toxicity of oxygenated aliphatic compounds homologous to the insecticide octanoic acid and the chemotaxis of two species of Drosophila. Pestic Biochem Physiol 1999, 65(2):90-101.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0123104

133.        Jones CD: The genetic basis of larval resistance to a host plant toxin in Drosophila sechellia. Genet Res 2001, 78(3):225-233.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0144885

134.        Jones CD: The genetic basis of Drosophila sechellia's resistance to a host plant toxin. Genetics 1998, 149(4):1899-1908.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0103289

135.        Shibata H, Yamazaki T: A comparative study of the enzymological features of alpha-amylase in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Jpn J Genet 1994, 69(3):251-258.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0076805

136.        Robertson HM: Mating behavior and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 1983, 37(6):1283-1293.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0039338

137.        von Schilcher F, Manning A: Courtship song and mating speed in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav Genet 1975, 5:395-404. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0027135

138.        Lachaise D: Reproductive allocation in tropical Drosophilidae: further evidence on the role of breeding-site choice. Am Nat 1983, 122(1):132-146.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0038841

139.        David J, Biemont C, Fouillet P: Sur la forme des courbes de ponte de Drosophila melanogaster et leur ajustement a des modeles mathematiques. Arch Zool exp gen 1974, 115:263-277. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025858

140.        Jones CD: Genetics of egg production in Drosophila sechellia. Heredity 2004, 92(3):235-241.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174735

141.        Soliman MH: Selection of site of oviposition by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Am Midl Nat 1971, 86:487-493. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0022087

142.        Jallon JM, David JR: Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Evolution 1987, 41(2):294-302.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0046207

143.        Jallon JM, Cobb M: Variations in potentially aphrodisiac cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. J Neurogenet 1987, 4:140-141. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0046803

144.        Cobb M, Burnet B, Blizard R, Jallon JM: Courtship in Drosophila sechellia: its structure, functional aspects, and relationship to those of other members of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. J Insect Behav 1989, 2(1):63-90.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0050326

145.        Luyten I: Intraspecific and interspecific variations of the cuticular hydro carbons in Drosophila simulans and related species. C r Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1982, 295(12):733-736.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037586

146.        Civetta A, Cantor EJ: The genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genet Res 2003, 82(2):117-126.PubMed-15123580

147.        Coyne JA, Crittenden AP, Mah K: Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 1994, 265(5177):1461-1464.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0077505.html

148.        Pechine JM, Perez F, Antony C, Jallon JM: A further characterization of Drosophila cuticular monoenes using a mass spectrometry method to localize double bonds in complex mixtures. Anal Biochem 1985, 145(1):177-182.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0041861

149.        Pechine JM, Antony C, Jallon JM: Precise characterization of cuticular compounds in young Drosophila by mass spectrometry. J chem Ecol 1988, 14(4):1071-1085.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0048547

150.        Mas F, Jallon JM: Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. J Chem Ecol 2005, 31(11):2747-2752.PubMed-16132336

151.        Moulin B, Rybak F, Aubin T, Jallon JM: Compared ontogenesis of courtship song components of males from the sibling species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Behav Genet 2001, 31(3):299-308.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0141370.html

152.        Civetta A, Montooth KL, Mendelson M: Quantitative trait loci and interaction effects responsible for variation in female postmating mortality in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia introgression lines. Heredity 2005, 94(1):94-100.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0187717

153.        Cowling DE, Burnet B: Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim Behav 1981, 29:924-935. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035763

154.        Peixoto AA, Hall JC: Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals new genes involved in the courtship song of Drosophila. Genetics 1998, 148(2):827-838.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0101981.html

155.        Demetriades MC, Thackeray JR, Kyriacou CP: Courtship song rhythms in Drosophila yakuba. Anim Behav 1999, 57(2):379-386.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0107672

156.        Ewing AW, Bennet-Clark HC: The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour 1968, 31:288-301. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0019195

157.        Wheeler DA, Fields WL, Hall JC: Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship songs: Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, and their interspecific hybrid. Behav Genet 1988, 18(6):675-703.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0047539

158.        Pugh AR, Ritchie MG: Polygenic control of a mating signal in Drosophila. Heredity 1996, 77(4):378-382.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0090750

159.        Gleason JM, Ritchie MG: Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL? Genetics 2004, 166(3):1303-1311.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0174687

160.        Kawanishi M, Watanabe TK: Genetic variations of courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Jpn J Genet 1980, 55(3):235-240.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035260

161.        Kawanishi M, Watanabe TK: Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Evolution 1981, 35(6):1128-1133.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0036384

162.        Kyriacou CP, Hall JC: Interspecific genetic control of courtship song production and reception in Drosophila. Science 1986, 232(4749):494-497.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045387

163.        Bennet-Clark HC, Ewing AW: Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 1969, 17:755-759. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0020199

164.        Kyriacou CP, Hall JC: Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short term fluctuations in the male's courtship song. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980, 77(11):6729-6733.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035546

165.        Kyriacou CP, Hall JC: Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship song rhythms. Anim Behav 1989, 37(5):850-859.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0049202

166.        Green CH, Burnet B, Connolly KJ: Organization and patterns of inter- and intraspecific variation in the behaviour of Drosophila larvae. Anim Behav 1983, 31(1):282-291.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0038859

167.        Barker JSF: Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations. Oecologia 1971, 8:139-156. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023087

168.        Parsons PA: Larval reaction to alcohol as an indicator of resource utilization differences between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Oecologia 1977, 30(2):141-146.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0030626

169.        Parsons PA: Larval reactions to possible resources in three species of Drosophila as indicators of ecological diversity. Aust J Zool 1979, 27(3):413-419.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032690

170.        Parsons PA, Spence GE: Larval responses to environmental ethanol in three Drosophila species: an indicator of habitat selection. Aust J Zool 1980, 28(4):543-546.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0034089

171.        Manning M, Markow TA: Light-dependent pupation site preferences in Drosophila. II. Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav Genet 1981, 11(6):557-563.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0035811

172.        Sakai T, Isono K, Tomaru M, Oguma Y: Contribution by males to intraspecific variation of the light dependency of mating in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genes & Genet Systems 1997, 72(5):269-274.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0103027

173.        Cobb M, Connolly K, Burnet B: The relationship between locomotor activity and courtship in the melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Anim Behav 1987, 35(3):705-713.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045589

174.        McDonald J, Parsons PA: Dispersal activities of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav Genet 1973, 3(3):293-301.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0024586

175.        Prince GJ, Parsons PA: Adaptive behaviour of Drosophila adults in relation to temperature and humidity. Aust J Zool 1977, 25:285-290. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0029591

176.        Parsons PA: Phototactic responses along a gradient of light intensities of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav Genet 1975, 5:17-25. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0027128

177.        Kawanishi M, Watanabe TK: Difference in photo-preferences as a cause of coexistence of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster in nature. Jpn J Genet 1978, 53(3):209. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032075

178.        Kekic V, Marinkovic D: Ecological and behavioral adaptations of Drosophila in field and laboratory conditions. Aquilo, Ser Zool 1979, 20:118-128. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032672

179.        Higa I, Fuyama Y: Genetics of food preference in Drosophila sechellia. I Responses to food attractants 1993, 88(2-3):129-136.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0064504

180.        Kawanishi M, Lee WH: Food preferences of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Jpn J Ecol 1978, 28(3):231-235.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0032070

181.        Rouault J, David J: Evolutionary biology of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: a behavioural divergence in microhabitat selection. Acta Oecol, Oecol gen 1982, 3:331-338. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0037392.html

182.        Cobb M, Burnet B, Connolly K: The structure of courtship in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Behaviour 1986, 97(1-2):182-212.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0043762

183.        Welbergen P, van Dijken FR, Scharloo W: Collation of the courtship behaviour of the sympatric species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behaviour 1987, 101:253-274. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045616

184.        Cobb M, Burnet B, Connolly K: Sexual isolation and courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans, Drosophila mauritiana, and their interspecific hybrids. Behav Genet 1988, 18(2):211-225.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0047531

185.        Ringo JM, Dowse HB, Barton KM: Courtship behavior and the kinetics of mating in three lines of Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Behav Genet 1987, 17(2):141-154.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0045617

186.        Spieth HT, Hsu TC: The influence of light on the mating behavior of seven species of the Drosophila melanogaster species group. Evolution 1950, 4:316-325. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0007753

187.        Sturtevant AH: The North American species of Drosophila. Publs Carnegie Instn 1921, 301:1-150. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0001113

188.        Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS: A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. J Evolution Biol 2006, 19(4):1058-1070. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0193123.html

189.        Lemeunier F: Le comportement sexuel de Drosophila yakuba; comparaison avec les autres especes du groupe melanogaster. C r hebd Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1971, 273:1488-1490.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0022177

190.        Cobb M, Ferveur JF: Evolution and genetic control of mate recognition and stimulation in Drosophila. Behavl Processes 1996, 35(1-3):35-54.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086361

191.        Sakai T, Isono K, Tomaru M, Fukatami A, Oguma Y: Light wavelength dependency of mating activity in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genes & Genet Systems 2002, 77(3):187-195.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0151995

192.        Grossfield J: Geographic distribution and light-dependent behavior in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1971, 68:2669-2673.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023148

193.        Hardeland R: Species differences in the diurnal rhythmicity of courtship behaviour within the melanogaster group of the genus Drosophila. Anim Behav 1972, 20:170-174. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0023328

194.        Allemand R: Importance evolutive du comportement de ponte chez les insectes: comparaison du rhythme circadien d'oviposition chez les six especes de Drosophila du sous-groupe melanogaster. C r hebd Seanc Acad Sci, Paris 1974, 279:2075-2077.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0025937

195.        Takamura T: Behavior genetics of choice of oviposition sites in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Differentiation of oviposition force in the melanogaster species sub-group. Jpn J Genet 1984, 59:71-81. http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0041419.html

196.        Chess KF, Ringo JM: Oviposition site selection by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Evolution 1985, 39(4):869-877.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0042498

197.        Jones CD: The genetics of adaptation in Drosophila sechellia. Genetica 2005, 123(1-2):137-145.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0187618.html

198.        Cobb M, Connolly K, Burnet B: Courtship behaviour in the melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Behaviour 1985, 95(3-4):203-231.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0041922

199.        Cobb M, Jallon JM: Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Anim Behav 1990, 39(6):1058-1067.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0051133

200.        Antony C, Davis TL, Carlson DA, Pechine JM, Jallon JM: Compared behavioral responses of male Drosophila melanogaster (Canton-S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J chem Ecol 1985, 11(2):1617-1629.http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0043077.html

201.        Jallon JM: A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav Genet 1984, 14(5):441-478.  http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0040347.html












back to  FlyPhenomics